Search for: "Shah v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am
Government Protect Congolese Immigrants in the United States? [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ngyuen, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 585 (18 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mayor of London v London Borough of Enfield [2008] EWCA Civ 202 (18 March 2008) LG (Italy) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 190 (18 March 2008) S v Floyd [2008] EWCA Civ 201 (18 March 2008) Housden & Anor v The Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons [2008] EWCA Civ 200 (18 March 2008)… [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:25 pm
ShareMonday’s arguments in Lac du Flambeau Band v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
United States, 295 U.S. 495, the United States Supreme Court held that Congress violated the "nondelegation doctrine" by granting certain rule-making powers to a non-governmental entity under color of Article 8 of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States which vests in Congress the "power to regulate commerce.... [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
United States, 295 U.S. 495, the United States Supreme Court held that Congress violated the "nondelegation doctrine" by granting certain rule-making powers to a non-governmental entity under color of Article 8 of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States which vests in Congress the "power to regulate commerce.... [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
United States, 295 U.S. 495, the United States Supreme Court held that Congress violated the "nondelegation doctrine" by granting certain rule-making powers to a non-governmental entity under color of Article 8 of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States which vests in Congress the "power to regulate commerce.... [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:07 pm
However, the sources of information listed in the regulation has expanded to include “any clinical or epidemiological investigations, animal or in vitro studies, reports in the scientific literature, and unpublished scientific papers, as well as reports from foreign regulatory authorities and reports of foreign commercial marketing experience for drugs that are not marketed in the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 6:47 am
In this article, we seek to answer these questions by examining how arbitration by combat agreements might implicate state and federal laws in the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
Md. 1976), and United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Hoffman-LaRoche v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
First Party v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
Shah, Slip. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am
Eisen (@NormEisen), Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw), Siven Watt (@SivenWatt), Francois Barrilleaux (@FrenchwaEB), Sasha Matsuki and Arava Rose United Nations The United Nations in Hindsight: UN Security Council Sanctions by Paul Romita (@PaulRomita), Erik Ramberg (@ErikTRamberg) and Karin Landgren (@LandgrenKarin) National Security at the United Nations This Week (Nov. 27-Dec. 1) by Ian Allen Podcast: Counterterrorism and Surveillance The Just Security Podcast: Counterterrorism… [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
International Court of Justice: South Africa v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Notwithstanding, that claim fails for the simple reason that the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
