Search for: "Sharpe Delivery Service, Inc."
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
It was held that the defendant arranged the delivery. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), failed to answer this question. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
Ryder Freight Sys., Inc., 855 S.W.2d 416, 422 (Mo.App. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
Access the press conference audio (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
September 13, 2010, Volume 2, Number 26 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:59 am
When asked how serious law firms are about changing their delivery model, the answers were in sharp contrast. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Belgium - eBay wins ruling against L’Oreal in dispute over liability for counterfeit goods sold in online auctions: (Managing Intellectual Property), (Counterfeit Chic), (IPKat), (Class 46), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica) US CAFC holds that copying free software without complying with license is copyright infringement: Robert Jacobsen v… [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Dart Industries, Inc. (1981) 29 Cal.3d 462, 471; Cal Pak Delivery, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and de-branding of… [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
Gore & Associates Inc. held to have willfully infringed rival C.R. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
Plaintiffs claim that such merchants are merely service providers who arrange for the order and delivery of products to be sent from a producer to a purchaser.The court characterized the issue as a simple one: "Did the merchants purchase the cathode they passed along to plaintiffs? [read post]
