Search for: "Sharpe v. Light" Results 21 - 40 of 752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2015, 11:07 am by Jack Goldsmith
  It was never a sharp distinction, and always depended on changing context. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
TransAlt) and (3) “it is transformative to take a photograph initially used to simply identify someone or show them in a positive light and use it in a critical manner” (cites to Katz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
He therefore concluded: 3.6 Insofar as it may be said that the terms of s. 7 are ambiguous or unclear, s. 7 must be interpreted in the light of Article 23 of the Directive. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm by John Bellinger
On December 19, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a brief order in the long-running Doe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
While the precise words used and the names of the persons to whom they were spoken (and when) must, so far as possible, be set out in the Particulars of Claim if not already contained in the Claim Form (CPR PD 53 para 2.4) the Court confirmed the narrow exception summarised by Sharp J in Freer v Zeb & Ors [2008] EWHC 212 (QB) [31]. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:32 am by Dave
Two major patent cases were decided today by a unanimous Supreme Court in short, sharp opinions reversing the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals: In the closely–watched Limelight v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:47 pm by INFORRM
In my view, in the light of the clear and close connection between them, the two articles must be read together for the purpose of determining meaning; and the contrary is not arguable. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:30 pm
This 10-year-old model is the same one that college student Kristy Williams was in on April 2010 when while stopped at a traffic light the vehicle's frontal air bags suddenly deployed, sending razor sharp metal pieces into the left side of her neck as the driver's side air bag exploded. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:25 am by Stephen Pitel
In Sharp v Autorité des marchés financiers, 2023 SCC 29 (available here) the Supreme Court of Canada has held that a Quebec administrative tribunal, the Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal, can hear a proceeding brought by the administrative agency that regulates Quebec’s financial sector, the Autorité des marchés financiers, against four defendants who reside in British Columbia. [read post]