Search for: "Shepherd v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2011, 5:25 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:33 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Paul A. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:08 pm
United States, 2007 WL 1952680 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:46 am
Ever since the US Supreme Court ruled in Morrison et al v National Australia Bank Ltd et al that claimants not residing in the United States or American citizens who purchased shares on a foreign exchange can’t settle or litigate their case in the US, these parties have been seeking other jurisdictions to get their claims resolved. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 1:02 pm
United States, or the Supreme Court’s Liparota v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
Over at The WSJ Law Blog, there's a nice profile of Richard Diaz, the Florida solo who represents Michael Williams, a defendant who is challenging the constitutionality of a federal child-pornography statute in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:48 am
England is trying to catch up with Ohio and the rest of the United States when it comes to Family Law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
Judge Shepherd then ends, as he frequently does when a ruling seems unfair -- by blaming the legislature: The passengers’ grievance in this case lies with the United States Congress. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 8:16 pm
Swan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:59 am
Tully, Getting it Wrong or Being Ignored: Ten Words on Advice for Government LawyersMichael Bowman, Transcending the Fisheries Paradigm: Towards a Rational Approach to Determining the Future of the International Whaling CommissionTrevor Ryan, Sea Shepherd v Greenpeace? [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:41 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:24 am
Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
For example, as early as 1970, the United States Supreme Court held in General Telephone Co. of the Northwest v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
