Search for: "Sherman v. Rose" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Consequently, American Needle's and other manufacturers' licences were not renewed and consumer prices for the teams' merchandise rose. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Andrew Schaengold
Supreme Court’s decision in Matsushita v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:46 am by Jeff Vail
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 590 (1994). [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm by Thomas D. Nevins
The majority stated that “the Sherman Act does not authorize . [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am by Nathaniel Grow
Specifically, in the 2004 case of Metropolitan Intercollegiate Basketball Ass'n v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:55 pm
FBI: Uploader Confesses to Pre-releasing Guns N' Roses Tracks Judge Hints at Mistrial in RIAA v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Drawing in witnesses When the Court recognized a public right of access to criminal trials, in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
Today’s task is to construct a historical baseline of the original Gilded Age lawyers, including how they navigated the political backlash that rose up against their clients, first in the form of aggressive antitrust enforcement and later in the form of New Deal Legislation. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]