Search for: "Sherman v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am
See Sohm v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
“The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists’ report of an alleged successful attack on M/V Ocean Jazz is patently false,” the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
We note, however, that questions about the domain of inquiry—of in-market vs. out-of-market effects—can arise in conduct cases brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Act (as in Ohio v American Express, where the Supreme Court considered both sides of a two-sided transactional platform as a single market) or under Section 2 (as in Aspen Skiing Co., where the Court, considering allegedly exclusionary conduct, held that “it is appropriate to examine the effect of the… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:34 am
Krause-Pettai v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:29 am
(The quicklook approach, see NCAA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Oral Judgment Criminal Law: Assault; DefenceR. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
The new statement should define an unfair method of competition as involving conduct that violates one of the two core antitrust statutes, the Sherman Act or the Clayton Act—no more, no less. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Sherman, et al. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 7:17 am
In Bowein v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
“All of us understanding the meaning of the third section,” Senator John Sherman of Ohio stated, “those men who have once taken an oath of office to support the Constitution of the United States and have violated that oath in spirit by taking up arms against the Government of the United States are to be deprived for a time at least of holding office. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:42 am
Celestin v. [read post]
