Search for: "Shields v. Social Security Administration Commissioner" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He argues this, despite the fact that Hammond did not create her own first-party SNT to potentially shield her income from such a benefit determination. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Because Wayne had been working in and out of his family's franchise business since he was 13, he qualified for Social Security survivor benefits even at his young age. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:38 am by INFORRM
The Victorian privacy commissioner argued that existing privacy laws are fragmented and inadequate to meet the privacy challenges faced by technological developments. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm by Robert McKennon
“Instead,” DeBofsky said, “courts conduct reviews of claim records assembled and shaped by self-serving insurance companies without hearing any testimony whatsoever, under a procedure that gives more deference to the insurance company than a court would give a Social Security administrative law judge in its review of a Social Security disability benefit claim denial. [read post]