Search for: "Short v. McKinney" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2015, 11:54 am
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
In short, an attorney or lawfirm can avoid being sued by the client through an arbitration clause in the attorney-client agreement that covers all possible future disputes with one exception: it preserves the firm's right to sue the client to recover its costs (and by extension, its fees), which is the only plausible claim that the law firm could have against a client. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:47 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Trade Organizations Push for HFCS Flexibility - Portland corporate lawyer Tyler Anderson of Stoel Rives on the Food Liability Law Blog Decline of Damage Awards: Soost v Merrill Lynch - Toronto attorney Lisa Stam on her blog, Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada Oh right! [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am by Stephen Bilkis
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
McKinney, 5th District holds that speedy trial on latter OVI charge did not begin to run until time of charge, not time of arrest… In State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm by Brian Shiffrin
  If the prosecutor is presenting on short notice, do your notice by email and fax, with an explanation included that you cannot send the letter by U.S. mail because of the short notice you received. [read post]