Search for: "Shy v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
  Con­gress could well interpret Article V as requiring that two-thirds of the states request a conven­tion more or less simultaneously. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:55 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
Lamb ­;­­­­23 If mandatory 180 days without parole, can’t get credit for inpatient State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
” Areeda & Hovenkamp §5.02; accord, Kalinow­ski §24.02[1]; United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
(…) If, for example, an action is in essence against a State even if the State is not a named party, then the State is the real party in interest and is entitled to invoke the Eleventh Amend­ment’s protection. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
Applying §4, this Court has consistently stated that “the immediate buyers from the alleged anti­trust violators” may maintain a suit against the antitrust violators, Kansas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by Jon Robinson
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:10 am
Medellín Case Has Huge Implications AbroadApril 9, 2008; Page A13 Your March 26 editorial "International Law, and Domestic Order," correctly recognizes that the importance of the recent Supreme Court decision in Medellín v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:14 am
United States, which upheld the convictions of Gordon Hira­;ba­ya­shi and Fred Kore­;ma­tsu for violating an order to report to an internment camp." [read post]