Search for: "Sierra Club v. US Fish and Wildlife Service"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
Further, addressing the legal issue whether the drought discussion was adequate under the requirement that it “sufficiently performs the function of facilitating ‘informed agency decision making and informed public participation’” (see Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:46 am
In US Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:22 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:10 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
Transportation Impacts and New VMT Methodology – In perhaps the most significant substantive change to the Guidelines, the Final Text adopts an alternative methodology for analyzing the significance of transportation impacts.[17] The Agency determined that the current level of service (“LOS”) methodology, which analyzes traffic congestion, tends to promote increased vehicle use, jeopardizing the ability to realize GHG emissions reduction goals. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
County of San Diego/Sierra Club, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Ministerial/Discretionary Distinction The First District helpfully elaborated on CEQA’s “functional test” for determining whether an agency’s project approval action is ministerial, rather than discretionary, in nature and therefore not subject to CEQA in Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
California Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
” Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Sierra Club, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
