Search for: "Sierra Club v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court in United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
" Sierra Club v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:04 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
” See, Sierra Club. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:03 am
Fish & Wildlife Service, nor [Marine Fisheries] enforce the ESA prohibition against the import into the United States of ESA-listed salmon caught in Canada. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
California Department of Fish and Game and Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
The cases scheduled for argument during the November session are below: United States Fish & Wildlife Service v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
” Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:22 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
United States Fish & Wildlife – 5/26/15. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a final environmental impact assessment for its proposed rule that would reinterpret the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 to prohibit only the intentional killing of birds. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Additionally, the LCRR has been challenged in court by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Newburgh Clean Water Project, NAACP, Sierra Club, United Parents Against Lead and the Attorneys General of New York, California, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
– Environmental Protection, February 26, 2010 United Parcel Service has agreed to pay a $53,931 civil penalty to U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
