Search for: "Silver v. Means et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
RIGHT, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE USE OF FORCE 69 (Louis Henkin et al., eds., 1989). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Fresh produce contaminated during cultivation, harvesting, processing, and distribution has also been a source of hepatitis A (Butot et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003; Fiore, 2004; Hutin, et al., 1999; Wheeler, et al., 2005). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
Microsoft Corp. v i4i Limited Partnership et al, No 10-290(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })(); . [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 8:46 am
Jadranko Prlić et al. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Realty One Group, et al.[8], one of the defendants, Michael Nelson, posted 5 paragraphs of a Las Vegas Review-Journal article, titled “Program may level housing sale odds”, on his website. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:37 am
The case is USA v Raj Rajaratnam et al, U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:37 am
The case is USA v Raj Rajaratnam et al, U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Bennett, et al. (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:05 pm
For example, in Camelot Event Driven Fund v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm
” Screening Justice—The Cinema of Law: Significant Films of Law, Order and Social Justice 77 (Strickland et al., eds. 2006). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
It may make sense, then, to consider the context in which the judges wrestle with the meaning they would construct for the term "plausible" within the lexicon of legal meaning making. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm
Radavoi, Elizabeth Crawford Spencer, et. al., Law-Guided CSR: Ten Commandments for the 21st Century, 9 Loy. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:18 am
San Mateo Community College District, et al. (1st Dist., Div. 1, 2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner) Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46) South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
