Search for: "Simmons v. Cohen"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 3:09 am
For example, "[a] cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice requires proof of three elements: (1) that the defendant failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by an ordinary member of the legal community, (2) that such negligence was the proximate cause of the actual damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) that, but for the defendant's negligence, the plaintiff would have been successful in the underlying action"… [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:17 am
David Stone from Simmons & Simmons was up next, saying he was about to fuse Joe Cohen's speech with Muskar's to help brands implement protection of their IP before getting to the point of litigation. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Simmons, 140 F.R.D. 416, 424 (D. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
BEARD v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
The defendant established that the plaintiff would be unable to prove that he would have been successful in the forfeiture action but for the alleged negligence (see Simmons v Edelstein, 32 AD3d 464, 465; Lichtenstein v Barenbaum, 23 AD3d 440; Edwards v Haas, Greenstein, Samson, Cohen & Gerstein, P.C., 17 AD3d 517, 519). [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action, or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010; Lamanna v Pearson & Shapiro, 43 AD3d 1111; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Otis Elevator Co., 861 F.2d 655, 660-61 (11th Cir. 1988); Simmons v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
Simmons. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Simmons - UP 200 with 97% in PA-08 Patrick Murphy v. [read post]
