Search for: "Simon-Harris v. Harris" Results 21 - 40 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 8:11 pm
" It's accompanied by a picture of one boy giving a CD-ROM to another boy:"Simon is giving Bob a copy of his class report on Harry Potter. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
In The New Republic, Simon Lazarus discusses the significance of last week’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last month about my certiorari petition in Herrera v. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 9:27 pm by Matt Cooper
Simon, a three-judge panel of the Eighth Circuit U.S. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:58 pm
Harris decision in the Baltimore Sun. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:36 am by INFORRM
The claim was issued on 6 October 2022 by Baroness Lawrence, Elizabeth Hurley,  Sir Elton John, David Furnish, Sir Simon Hughes Prince Harry and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
In a few of the cases applying the prudential factors, the court has still found no political question (e.g., Ralls; Simon). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm by cdw
Noted since the last edition: US Harry Mitts v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:47 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
 As a range of authors have noted, title registration systems are an important mechanism in turning land into a liquid asset, (Harris 2010: 263, de Soto 2000, Pasternak 2014). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
Simon’s new book about the relationship between President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Supreme Court in the New Deal era. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate, Simon Lazarus suggests that last week’s majority opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  At ACSblog, Marco Simons discusses Kiobel v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
” The Spectator has compiled a list of five instances where Harry himself is responsible for breaching the privacy and breaking the confidences of his own family. [read post]