Search for: "Sims v. American Can Company"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: 13-14 July - WIPO conference on IP and public policy - climate change; food security, public health (WIPO) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) ECJ: National emblem rules apply to service mark applications too: American Clothing v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (Excess Copyright)… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Sims, who is of counsel with The Kullman Firm, at jds@kullmanlaw.com. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Sims, who is of counsel with The Kullman Firm, at jds@kullmanlaw.com. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:47 am
What can I say about Dottie? [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: David Lammy announces research programme to explore role of IP as facilitator of innovation and economic growth (IPKat) (IPKat) (IAM) USPTO to use Indian traditional knowledge database (Managing Intellectual Property) (Spicy IP) (Securing Innovation) Global Global - General Forbidden City, global firm and thank you… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Council Regulation 1229/2008 enters San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI) into Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Class 46) Court of First Instance, consolidating four appeals, annuls decisions of Board of Appeal and awards costs to Budvar in proceedings over BUD appellation: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Office for… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – Roche appeals preliminary injunction barring US sales of Mircera in patent infringement battle with Amgen: (Philip Brooks), (IP Law360), Norvasc (Amlodipine) – Ranbaxy becomes first foreign generic company to develop a generic product independently outside Japan and receive authorization from MHLW-Japan:… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Luminant Generation Company LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 505 (2010)). [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Silicon Valley v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
We then explored the form and legal “cultures” of the principal forms of law in the American Republic. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:33 am
In addition, the Sixth Circuit will be hearing the EEOC’s appeal of the lower court decision in EEOC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
Sims, protecting the principle of "one person, one vote," Gideon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:01 pm
If the presumption of prejudice can be rebutted on that kind of showing, the presumption has no meaning at all. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
