Search for: "Singer v Singer"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
” Cariou v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in Philpot v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in Philpot v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
In particular, it discusses the weaknesses of Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:33 am
” Phat Scooters, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 7:29 am
Glover v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
Cramer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
A woman filed a sexual assault lawsuit against singer Steven Tyler of Aerosmith for an alleged incident that occurred “approximately” around 1975 in New York. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
Singer-songwriter, Mariah Carey, is being sued by country musician, Andy Stone, who claims that she plagiarised his song, which shares the title with her number one hit, “All I Want for Christmas Is You”. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 2:50 pm
” (Lawler v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
The overlooked majority: the limits of Whitney v CIRRichard Thomas (First Tier Tribunal, UK)7. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:21 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:09 pm
[h/t Terin V. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st… [read post]