Search for: "Slade v. Slade" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
"A mandatory interim order permitting claimants to image and inspect defendants' electronic devices and to delete confidential-wink-wink-nudge-nudge information is available, said Mrs Justice Slade in Arthur J Gallagher Services and others v Skriptchenko and Others. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:06 am
"The judge also referred to his reading of the judgment of Mrs Justice Slade, DBE, in Homawoo v GMF Assurance SA [2010] EWHC 1941 (QB) who had herself been asked to determine whether Rome II applied to a claim. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
These were all rejected in turn by Mrs Justice Slade: Defamation – any possible defamation claim by the Applicant would be statute-barred. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
These were all rejected in turn by Mrs Justice Slade: Defamation – any possible defamation claim by the Applicant would be statute-barred. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:12 pm
  See, e.g., Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:12 pm
  See, e.g., Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:59 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Supreme Court term, the Harvard Law Review addresses the Court's most important decisions, and this year includes the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"In April, Texas' Seventh Court of Appeals, agreed in a case called Sutherland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:55 am by INFORRM
Over the last term there was one libel case in the Supreme Court (Flood v Times Newspapers) and two in the Court of Appeal (Cambridge v Makin and Ashcroft v Foley). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:47 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
The Court of Appeal judgment Agreeing with the Master, and disagreeing with Slade J in the High Court, the Court of Appeal held that D could no longer be considered good law in light of Mitchell and Michael. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  We will mention only three – the first instance judgment in the privacy case of WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J), the Court of Appeal judgment in the “privilege against self-incrimination” case of Phillips v NGN, heard 28 and 29 November 2011 by Judge LCJ, Neuberger MR, Kay V-P and the Supreme Court “Reynolds” judgment in Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 17 and 18 October 2011. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
 | Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko  [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
The language adopted by Sir Slade in that case, is more one of failure of consideration, entitling the claimant to restitution. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]