Search for: "Slough v. Slough"
Results 21 - 40
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 12:00 pm
Hicks v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
Guinness Partnership Limited v England, County Court at Slough, 29 April 2019 Ms E was the assured tenant of Guinness. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on the issue of whether the question of citizenship should be on the census in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
In People ex rel Becerra v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:17 am
Slough, 677 F.Supp.2d 112, 166 (D.D.C. 2009) (citing Kastigar v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
See United Public Workers v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:02 pm
The petition of the day is: Slough v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:29 pm
Justice Slough's opinion is 94 (!) [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
Following the Court of Appeal decision in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 a public authority will not be allowed to rely on a defence of qualified privilege if such reliance is incompatible with the claimant’s right to respect for his private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
Second, it may be noted that Dr Butt’s case raises questions similar to those considered by the Court of Appeal in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] 1 WLR 1774, namely the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 impacts upon defences available to public authorities to negate tortious liability. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” President Andrew Jackson famously responded to the Supreme Court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
Under s.21, National Assistance Act 1948 both the House of Lords and the Supreme Court had held that a need for accommodation was not sufficient to engage the duty; the duty to provide accommodation only arose if the need for care and attention, which was a need to be looked after, was for services that were not otherwise available unless residential accommodation was provided: M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 and R (SL) v Westminster CC [2013] UKSC 27. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:56 pm
4/2's website page now features a photo of Justice Marsha Slough, who was confirmed in February. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Supp.2d 695 (D.N.J. 2013); Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing explains decision in United States v. $167,070 in United States Currency: It begins with the flimsiest of “reasonable suspicion” and heads downhill after that. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:28 am
The case of Reckis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The top layer of her skin sloughed off, she lost the ability to eat without a feeding tube, and she suffered heart failure, liver failure, and a stroke, underwent brain surgery, and lost most of her lung capacity. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
– Mark Thomson Case Law: Cooper v Turrell – the assessment of damages for libel and misuse of private information – Hugh Tomlinson QC Hemming and Haigh: Freedom of Speech and Abuse of Privilege Opinion: “Role models and hypocrites” – Max Mosley “Harassment and the Media”: Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann Case Law: “Clift v Slough Borough Council – Qualified Privilege meets Article 8″ – Lorna… [read post]
