Search for: "Smalls v. Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm
As Bill and I noted Monday, the AP report on the juvenile LWOP case, Miller v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:59 am
We disagree, and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.")AC33759 - Small v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 3:04 pm
[See, Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Assn. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:04 am
GE v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:01 am
Surely, in such a case, the correct course of action was to transfer the proceedings? [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
Davignon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 3:07 am
TC Heartland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:54 pm
Second, Small v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:14 pm
In this week’s case (Arndt v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:04 pm
Fortunately, as is usually the case, painstaking attention to other small details enables us to correct this injustice. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 4:55 pm
State Bank of Toulon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:17 am
The correction to “Loma Linda 1” came in a majority decision in “Loma Linda 2”, Loma Linda University Adventist Health Sciences Center, Loma Linda University and Loma Linda University Medical Center v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:55 am
Later this year, the Supreme Court will take up the case of Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:41 pm
(See Coker v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 10:08 am
Previous Bites:Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: Bite #1 and Bite #2 (Bill of Rights, 1-6)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: Bite #3 (Bill of Rights, 7-12)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: #4 (Bill of Rights, 13-20)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: #5 (Bill of Rights, 21-30)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: #6 (Bill of Rights, 32-39)Oregon Constitution in Small Bites: Bite #7 (Bill of Rights, 40-42)40. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:08 pm
The answer to both questions is no, and we affirm Defendant Charles Kirvin’s convictions and, with one small correction, the 26-year prison sentence imposed in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:33 am
Because of last years' decision by the Supreme Court in Arbaugh v. [read post]
