Search for: "Smallwood v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 3:21 am by traceydennis
Court of Apeal (Civil Division) Mentmore International Ltd & Ors v Abbey Healthcare (Festival) Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 761 (07 July 2010) Gale & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 759 (07 July 2010) Revenue and Customs v Smallwood & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 778 (08 July 2010) London Borough of Brent v Corcoran & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 774 (08 July 2010) Davies & Ors v Pay [2010] EWCA Civ 752 (08 July 2010)… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He is also incorrect to suggest that it makes any difference whether an appellate court, when rejecting an Edwards v Bairstow challenge, expresses its agreement with the conclusion of the fact-finding tribunal or states only that the tribunal was entitled to reach that conclusion on the material before it. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am by CMS
Condition C states that, as a requirement for issuing a follower notice, HMRC must be “of the opinion that there is a judicial ruling which is relevant to the chosen arrangements”. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The blog of the Historical Society of the Courts of the State of New York profiles Charlotte Smallwood-Cook, the first woman District Attorney in New York State. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
State and the federal First Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:52 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Smallwood Court Finds That SMS Spam Messages are Subject to the TCPA and Rejects First Amendment Defense — Abbas v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Attorney General United States, No. 19-1404 (3d Cir. 2020) Related posts: Fourth Circuit Rejects Anti-Spam Lawsuit–Omega World Travel v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 10:25 am by Garrett Parks and Claudia Ren
Back in February 2024, California State Senator Lola Smallwood-Cuevas introduced SB 1137, which aimed to make California the first state to explicitly recognize “intersectionality” in anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
State, 113 So.3d 724 (Florida Supreme Court 2013) (`while law enforcement officers properly separated and assumed possession of a cell phone from Smallwood's person during the search incident to arrest, a warrant was required before the information, data, and content of the cell phone could be accessed and searched by law enforcement. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112… [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Thomure, 484 F.3d 1081, 1084 (8th Cir. 2007); Smallwood v. [read post]