Search for: "Smith v. Chief Judge" Results 21 - 40 of 1,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Following the Supreme Court's remand to the Tenth Circuit, which in turn led to the remand to district court, Chief Judge Philip Brimmer (D. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
June 20, 2000) (noting that “question of intent is a classic jury question and not one for experts”); Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Article assembles and clarifies the two chief objections to tiers of scrutiny: its incompatibility with original meaning and its subjectivity for judges. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am by Alex Phipps
Chief Judge Dillon, joined by Judge Stading, concurred by separate opinion and suggested that defendant may have committed another offense from common law such as “misconduct in public office. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Chief Justice Salmon Chase, who was writing for an appeals court, ruled in 1869 that the “insurrectionist ban” could not be enforced against the judge unless Congress first passed a law. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Instead, Chase was adjudicating a habeas petition from a defendant sentenced by Judge Sheffey who was asking to have Sheffey’s actions declared invalid on grounds that the judge was acting ultra vires due to his Se [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am by Norman L. Eisen
In December, Smith asked for 21 days between the Court granting cert and oral argument (per the U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]