Search for: "Smith v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am by Nelson Tebbe
(Under the current free exercise rule, articulated in Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court Act 1089 (d) 2 (vii) was amended by adding a new clause (H) and Social Services Law §358-a, subd. 3 was amended by adding a new paragraph (g).Laws of 2019, Ch 716, enacted and effective December 20, 2019, amended Domestic Relations Law and the Civil Rights Law. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Upon logging in to a social media website, Rose discovered that a party attendee’s daughter was being hospitalized for Salmonella poisoning. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
In February 2017, the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a petition against the mother alleging that she derivatively neglected the child. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
There will be a discussion after Smith’s presentation moderated by Darrell West. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Similarly, the Social Services Law provides that, once approved, subsidy payments “shall be made until the child’s twenty first birthday” (SSL § 453 [1][a] ) and that payment of the subsidy may only be suspended if ACS “determines that the adoptive parents are no longer legally responsible for the support of the child or the child is no longer receiving any support from such parents” (SSL § 453[1][c]; see also 42 USC §… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Similarly, the Social Services Law provides that, once approved, subsidy payments “shall be made until the child’s twenty first birthday” (SSL § 453 [1][a] ) and that payment of the subsidy may only be suspended if ACS “determines that the adoptive parents are no longer legally responsible for the support of the child or the child is no longer receiving any support from such parents” (SSL § 453[1][c]; see also 42 USC §… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Smith decision (a decision that I myself support, though I also support the existence of jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction Religious Freedom Restoration Act statutes). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  (The government subsidies for this fourth option are calibrated to family income; my understanding is that the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction are not available for those families with income above 400% of the federal poverty level, or about $94,000 for a family of four. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Downward Modification of Child Support Based on a Loss of Employment Due to Injury Granted Where Father Demonstrated Injuries Severely Limited His Ability to Resume His Veterinary Practice In Smith v Smith, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 88100 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) pursuant to a 2002 judgment of divorce, defendant (mother) was awarded sole custody of the parties' four children. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parents Kenneth M.Y. and Rita S., appealed from an order of fact-finding and disposition determining, following a fact-finding hearing, that their children were neglected and placing the children in the custody of petitioner Chautauqua County Department of Social Services (DSS), and from a corrected order that denied their motion to vacate the order of fact-finding and disposition in appeal No. 1. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Jana Singer
  The Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The positions were "unclassified" and not protected under the Tennessee Civil Service Merit System. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/835705.opn.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]