Search for: "Smith v. Davis et al" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith. 22 Journal of Law & Policy 483-766 (2014). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
With Bexis and McConnell now at Reed Smith, we’ve gained access to Reed’s database on the ubiquitous plaintiffs’ expert Dr. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by Sasha Romanosky
Further, in Davis et al. v Videoegg Inc., 2010 WL 3839312 (C.D.Cal.), the complaint states that “VideoEgg…set online tracking devices which would allow access to, and disclosure of [PII] …without actual notice, awareness, or consent and choice of its users…” Not surprisingly, these actions are more common in recent years, likely driven by the explosive popularity of social media, behavioral advertising and flash cookies. [read post]