Search for: "Smith v. Delaware State Housing Authority." Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Only three states still have separate courts of equity—Delaware, Mississippi, and Tennessee—though a handful of other states do draw some jurisdictional distinction between law and equity cases.[12] But in all fifty states “equity” remains part of the everyday vocabulary of courts and lawyers. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As a result of this decision, several states began to enact corporate indemnification statutes.8 In 1967, the State of Delaware passed new indemnification laws specifically authorizing corporations to purchase D&O liability insurance; by 1973, 25 other states had followed Delaware’s lead.9 Until this time, it was unclear if a corporation could legally pay the cost of the individual liability of a director or officer under the… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
Justice Ginsburg pushed Perry further stating that “in fact, it was JCM’s lawyers . . . they were in-house lawyers for JCM. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Federal Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Senate and House bills capping carbon dioxide emissions would reduce them by 17 to 20 percent by 2020, compared with 2005 levels. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:32 pm
The five-member Delaware Supreme Court unanimously ruled on February 3 in Smith v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Almeida-Perez, No. 07-2602, 07-2635 In a prosecution of two brothers for being illegal aliens in possession of firearms that had been transported in interstate commerce, denial of defendants' motion to suppress evidence is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) finding that police reasonably relied on the real or apparent authority of defendants' cousin to consent to police entry of their house; 2) finding that other occupants of their house… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Hamilton, No. 06-2933 Conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana is remanded for further proceedings where defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized from a house, in which he claimed a privacy interest, could not properly be denied on grounds of lack of standing without a hearing. [read post]