Search for: "Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
It has done so for example for the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Health and Human Services, Transportation, and for the Department of Justice, but specifically only for the Bureau of Prisons, and not more broadly for other DOJ components. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 12:56 pm
According to a 2011 Federal Bureau of Investigators affidavit, the device captures data from all devices in an area—even those of bystanders not targeted for investigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 8:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
As part of a subsequent investigation, Waukesha county law enforcement contacted Federal Bureau of Investigations Special Agent Michael Eckel regarding a search of Johnson's rented residence in Rosarito, Mexico. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:45 pm
According to Congressman Smith, who offered an amendment to lift the ban on transfers of detainees to the United States for detention and trial, it costs American taxpayers a whopping $1.6 million per detainee at Guantánamo - nearly 50 times the cost of holding inmates in federal Bureau of Prisons facilities. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:36 pm
Arrington v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:17 am
Sineneng-Smith (Feb. 25): Constitutionality of a federal law that makes it a crime to encourage or cause illegal immigration for financial gain. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
The question presented is what standard the federal court should apply in considering such a claim, and in particular whether the federal court can consider evidence that was not presented to the state courts. ------- Title: Smith v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
Richey, 18-761 Issue: Whether prison inmates have a First Amendment right to include threatening, abusive and irrelevant language in grievances. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1062 (6th Cir. 1998), we affirm. 07a0438p.06 Smith, et al. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:53 pm
Ward v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
