Search for: "Smith v. General Apartment Co." Results 21 - 40 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As my co-author (Akhil Amar) and I discuss in an Article forthcoming in The Supreme Court Review (a draft of which is available on SSRN here), recent attention concerning ISL theory may have been generated by members of the Supreme Court itself; four Justices, drawing on arguments advanced in the Bush v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Again, Congress can address this under the ACC, but courts don't under the DCC.Another issue is tax exportation (actual or attempted), but to things from getting too longwinded I will leave it out here.Economics - There is a long tradition, prominent (for example) in the work of Adam Smith, to the effects that tariffs are generally inefficient. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Josh Blackman
(I am co-counsel with Becket in a different case challenging New York's lockdown measures). [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Claiborne Hardware Co. applies that to civil liability as well.) [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm by Marty Lederman
  As the Court has explained in cases such as Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 11 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]