Search for: "Smith v. Indiana State of et al" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Finding for the plaintiffs, the Court of Appeals of Indiana held: "we find that there was probative evidence that [cooperative’s] losses were due to a failure to hedge. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
Finding for the plaintiffs, the Court of Appeals of Indiana held: "we find that there was probative evidence that [cooperative’s] losses were due to a failure to hedge. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
  That case, from Indiana, asks the Court to interpret the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 2006, requiring those convicted of sex crimes to register with state and federal databases. [read post]