Search for: "Smith v. Judges"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2016, 10:34 am
Judge Callahan dissents. [read post]
17 May 2017, 8:55 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Reactions to recent killing The appellant, Marvin Jahvon Smith, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Harford County by a jury, presided over by Judge Yolanda L. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 2:58 pm
RICHARD SMITH; from Harris County; 1st district (01-05-01157-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09-14-06)Set to be argued orally September 10, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.Opinion below: City of Pasadena v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
Smith, later consolidated into United States v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:29 pm
Smith, Docket No. 16-1067, J. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 6:38 am
What, then, to make of Smith v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:12 pm
Here is a CNN piece on United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
Having just noted that His Honour Judge Birss is stepping up from the PCC to hear the Apple v Samsung design case on Monday, this Kat was delighted to notice that the same Judge has just issued a lovely decision in a patent case, again sitting as a High Court judge. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
To Judge Taranto’s credit, the Yu v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
To Judge Taranto’s credit, the Yu v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
(Orin Kerr) Smith v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
FITZWATER, Senior District Judge. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:32 am
Smith; and (3) the recent case of Santiago v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:04 am
Smith v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 2:15 pm
Smith concurs in the result of (but does not join) Parts V and VI of Judge Hurwitz’s opinion. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 12:10 pm
Stephen Smith (Santa Clara University - School of Law) has posted United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:51 am
Lionel Smith and Remus D. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 6:54 am
Judge Jerry Smith Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod Here is the audiotape of the oral arguments before the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:35 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc. raised issues about the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) serving on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), it should be remembered that it also wiped out a PTAB decision in favor of Smith & Nephew in the underlying inter partes review of Arthrex's U.S. [read post]
