Search for: "Smith v. Kaye"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 2:31 pm
In H.M. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
- Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
Smith and Floyd v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:36 am
Nor, writes Smith, is this the first defense verdict in Marshall this year - in April, in Sofpool v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 6:02 pm
Judge Kaye said the V-cut of robes makes for an awkward fit for women, while a perfect fit for a man with a shirt and tie. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:31 am
Judge Kaye said the V-cut of robes makes for an awkward fit for women, while a perfect fit for a man with a shirt and tie. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:14 am
Judge Smith wrote the dissent, in which Judge Piggott concurred. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:24 pm
The first, U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
On March 18, 2008, the New York Court of Appeals, which is New York's highest court, decided Appleton Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:47 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:21 pm
Judge Smith then asked rhetorically, "What would you do? [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:15 pm
(Dan Keating and V. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Waxman et. al., Amicus Brief in Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:53 pm
Of course, some judges have pointed out the irrationality of accepting this argument, most notably Chief Judge Kaye (dissenting) on the NY Court of Appeals last summer in Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:19 am
Justice Burke delivered the opinion for the court. ----------------------------------------------- Link: [tinyurl.com] Decision issued: December 28, 2006 Case Name: SUSAN KAYE CRACKENBERGER V. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:40 pm
Gonzales and Toledo-Flores v. [read post]
