Search for: "Smith v. Paul" Results 21 - 40 of 1,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:20 am
In the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Smith, which holds that laws of general applicability that burden religious exercise are not subject to strict scrutiny. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Smith was detained on 6 May 2023 for 14 hours. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Also on 21 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Smith v Backhouse [2023] EWCA Civ 874. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 11 July 2023, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal over undertakings in the harassment case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith will pay defendants’ legal costs in his failed defamation case, ABC reports. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Constitutional Interpretation and Zombie Provisions, (Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 40, (Forthcoming)).Paul-Olivier Klein & Shee-Yee Khoo, P(r)aying for Religion? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen) and Oliver Edwards are defending against the claims (in Joe Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]