Search for: "Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
At paragraph 49 of his judgment, the learned judge cited Lord Bingham’s much repeated observations as to the purposes of an “Article 2 investigation” in the leading case of R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department.[7] These purposes include bringing the facts to light, exposing discreditable conduct or dangerous practices, and providing some degree of comfort to the deceased’s relative by ensuring that lessons are learnt from… [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
Smith, 786 F.2d 1011, 1012 (11th Cir. 1986)); see also Ritter v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis was held at the Nassau County Correctional Center.As part of the procedure followed by the Nassau County Police Department, upon Francis's arrest, his fingerprints were taken and submitted to federal databases. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Shah replied, "[y]es, you are correct . . . . [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm
Texas The Supreme Court will hear the Biden Administration’s appeal of a nationwide injunction prohibiting the Department of Homeland Security from fulfilling its immigration enforcement actions as defined by the guidance issued by the secretary. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Smith 19-1106Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Members of the 83d Congress might beg to correct the record on this point. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
Smith v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
§ 502 when the Veterans Judicial Reform Act provides the sole avenue for review of the Secretary’s decisions; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
The question that the justices agreed to review today in Smith v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Bin Laden, Smith v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
Dep’t of State, 251 F.3d 192 (D.C.Cir.2001) (a foreign organization with property in the United States entitled to constitutional due process hearing before Secretary of State may classify it as a “foreign terrorist organization”); Cardenas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm
And the secretary’s knowledge of the recording would be imputed to him. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
That happens to be the correct legal result. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
On July 19, 2007, DOC Secretary James M [read post]
