Search for: "Smith v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 6:21 am
Assuming without deciding that United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 7:19 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 12:20 pm
Citing a 1968 California appellate decision, Smith v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm
Smith filed legal claims seeking a piece of his fortune in two different states; she lost in Texas but won in California. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Reed Smith will continue to monitor Supreme Court decisions as well as any state or federal responses to those decisions. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 8:14 am
Smith, 472 F.3d 222 (4th Cir.2006) (same), with United States v. [read post]
GOVERNOR BROWN ASKED TO COMMUTE SHIRLEY REE SMITH’S SENTENCE AFTER SUPREME COURT REINSTATES SENTENCE
5 Jan 2012, 11:17 pm
While all agree that the evidence against Smith was weak, the Supreme Court set the standard for reversal in Jackson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am
From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Our contributors include: Roderick Hills, New York University Carissa Hessick, Arizona State University Kevin Johnson, University California, Davis Larry Joseph, Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund Hope Lewis, Northeastern University Richard Samp, Washington Legal Foundation Ilya Shapiro, Cato Institute Rogers Smith, University of Pennsylvania Peter Spiro, Temple University Margret Stock, University of Alaska, Anchorage & Lane Powell PC Carol Swain,… [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
The petition of the day is: California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
" without asking the technical, legal question "are you registered with the state of California as domestic partners or married, or both? [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:14 am
Controller of the State of California, LASC BC487949 Today's DJ reports that judges and justices who wish to retire early but are blocked by the anti-moonlighting rule from taking new state jobs until their terms end, have had their hopes dashed by a ruling upholding the rule. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:21 pm
On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in National Meat Association v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
