Search for: "Smith v. Strickland"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
The majority held that the error was prejudicial, and the state court’s contrary conclusion was an objectively unreasonable application of the governing case, Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
Smith and Rompilla v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
In Hawkins v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
The starters (1) Interim injunction surprise In Neurim v Mylan [2020] EWHC 1362 (Pat), Marcus Smith J ruled on the claimants’ application for a prohibitory injunction. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:13 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am
The Court then turned to the applicable review in the current case, explaining that under Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Smith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
Smith and Floyd v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011); Burdine v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011); Burdine v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:04 am
Such failure to investigate violated Strickland. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Strickland v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:53 pm
Bypassing the deficient performance prong of the Strickland v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
The Georgia Attorney General counters in his opp that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision is correct under a straightforward application of Strickland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm
’ ” Id., at 318 (citing Smith v. [read post]
