Search for: "Smith v. Strickland" Results 21 - 40 of 118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am by Jonathan Holbrook
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm by Shea Denning
Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007) (officer acted reasonably in ramming his bumper into suspect’s vehicle to terminate high-speed chase that lasted for six minutes over ten miles and during which the suspect’s car hit a police car); Smith v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The starters (1) Interim injunction surprise In Neurim v Mylan [2020] EWHC 1362 (Pat), Marcus Smith J ruled on the claimants’ application for a prohibitory injunction. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
  Which consists entirely of Judges Bybee and Milan Smith. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Smith that the free exercise clause does not require religious exemptions from laws that are neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
ADA pleading – more than boilerplate is required Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Strickland in holding that those districts were not narrowly tailored to the compelling governmental interest of compliance with the Voting Rights Act. [read post]