Search for: "Sole v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am by James Segroves
No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 . [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Plaintiff Ordered to Re-Open Social Media Account for Discovery: In Chapman v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
Chief Craig says that no one will be the subject of criminal charges based solely on facial recognition; that the software would not be used for real-time identification; and that officers that transgress these limits would be subject to disciplinary and possibly criminal sanctions.Once the Board of Police Commissioners settles on policy guidelines for their facial recognition software, the policy goes to the Detroit City Council for a ratification vote. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Exhibit 1 is a benefit verification letter from the Social Security Administration dated October 15, 2021, that verifies applicant’s entitlement to monthly disability benefits. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
            Section 3 provides that an ownership interest or an investment interest:[1] (a) may be through equity, debt or other means; but (b) shall not include ownership of investment securities, including shares or bonds, debentures, notes or other debt instruments, which were purchased on terms generally available to the public and which are in a corporation that is listed for trading on the New York stock exchange or on… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The State Commissioner upheld the discontinuance on the grounds that Mrs. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:13 pm by Adam Levitin
Howey dealt solely with the question of what is an "investment contract," which is one of the many things in the definitional list of "security. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
” It is unclear whether the claim relates solely to the training of the Stability AI system, or whether it includes the outputs of that system. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
But the Secure Training Centre Rules are more specific. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Court of Appeals Paternity - Defense of Equitable Estoppel - Applied to Deny Non-Biological Father Right to Deny Paternity In Commissioner of Social Services on Behalf of Elizabeth S. v. [read post]