Search for: "Sonoma V, in Re" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 2:30 pm by Luke Gilman
Williams-Sonoma, re requiring zip code in credit card transactions, http://ow.ly/458i9 # "Forms of storytelling have changed but the heart of journalism has not and will not. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  Police believe that a young child was using a kickboard in the swimming pool at a Sonoma condominium complex when he slipped off the board. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Brendon Tavelli
” The plaintiff argued, as the California Supreme Court held in Pineda v Williams Sonoma, that “address” meant each and every component of an address. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Ill. 2008) (China; address was arguably unknown) Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. [read post]