Search for: "Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2011, 11:47 am by Shannon Landreth
IMS Health Inc., found that speech to further pharmaceutical marketing is a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:08 am by firstamendmentblogger
Today’s New York Times presents an editorial criticizing the majority opinion for making it harder to governments to protect consumers. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 1:48 pm by David Markus
IMS Health, Inc., 564 U.S. 552, 563–67, 571–72 (2011), we agree with the district court that FOPA’s content-based restrictions—the record-keeping, inquiry, and anti-harassment provisions—violate the First Amendment as it applies to the states. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:25 am by Conor McEvily
IMS Health Inc.Docket: 10-779Issue(s): Whether a law that restricts access to information in nonpublic prescription drug records and affords prescribers the right to consent before their identifying information in prescription drug records is sold or used in marketing violates the First Amendment.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief for respondents IMS Health Inc. et al. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:37 am by Brock Meeks
IMS Health Inc., has serious implications for how privacy protections are interpreted. [read post]