Search for: "Sound Testing, Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
With respect to sampling sound recordings, the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:54 am
In re Spy Tec International Inc., Serial No. 87543668 (June 13, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Francie R. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:58 am
" Applicant pointed out the lack of evidence of third-party use of “sound” and “AI” together to describe any goods or services.].In re Night Shift Brewing, Inc., Application Serial No. 87321948 (March 17, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:34 pm
Three new opinions out of Division I today: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:46 am
" However, the "S" does not created an additional syllable in the cited mark or otherwise significantly change its appearance or sound as compared to applicant's mark. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:18 am by Docket Navigator
[Defendant] contends that [the expert's] assumption of a 50% capture rate does not constitute sound economic proof and does not satisfy the Panduit test. . . . [read post]
Jim Higgins is a director of talent assessment at Biddle Consulting Group, Inc., a nationally recognized leader in equal employment opportunity compliance, federal contractor compensation, and employment testing. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:33 am
The Board found the marks to be "very similar" and it affirmed the refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: The Beverly sounds like a hotel, while Beverly Jeans sounds like a person's name. [read post]