Search for: "South Carolina v. Ross" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
South Carolina Coastal Council. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This week, IJ's own Rob Frommer told the South Carolina Supreme Court that the state's civil forfeiture law is unconstitutional: when property is seized (often without charging anyone with a crime), the law gives owners no way to get it back for months or years and forces them to prove their own innocence. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a majority in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Panel - Policy Surveillance for Public Health Advancement Moderator: Benjamin Meier, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jamie Chriqui, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health Steven Hoffman, Osgoode Hall Law School Nadia Sawicki, Loyola University Chicago School of Law B. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
In 2014, the defendant moved Ceres’s operations to South Carolina, vacated Pedani’s building, and stopped paying rent to Pedani. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
In 2014, the defendant moved Ceres’s operations to South Carolina, vacated Pedani’s building, and stopped paying rent to Pedani. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Eugene Volokh
Former employees of South Carolina nursing homes sue, alleging, based on statistical sample of patient records, that the nursing homes defrauded Medicare. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Searle & Co., 979 F.2d 1001, 1003 (4th Cir. 1992) (applying South Carolina law); Muzichuck v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC lawyer Anna Ross of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Health Care Law Today How An Obscure Ruling Involving the SEC Impacts Construction Contractors – Philadelphia lawyer Wally Zimolong on his blog, Supplemental Conditions Tort Reform Results: Higher Insurance Profits, Lower Patient Safety Initiatives & Higher Med Mal Premiums for Doctors – Anderson lawyer Trey Mills of Trammell & Mills on his… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Liz Kramer
  The Supreme Court of South Carolina reversed. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]