Search for: "Sowers v. Sowers"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
Sowers, 252 Va. 71, 78 (1996). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
Sowers, 252 Va. 71, 78 (1996)(emphasis added). [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
Almy v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Really, she is the most careless sower of discord since George W. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
Sowers. (1914). [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 3:16 pm
Thus, the statute is not unconstitutional.Estate of Minnie Lynn Sower et al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
The Supreme Court, in a majority opinion by Justice Ruth Ginsburg [Ratslaf v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
" Sowers, 577 N.E.2d at 252. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:36 am
Shawe v Elting, C.A. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
” Sowers v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
The hard lesson learned by the petitioner in Matter of Norvell v Guchi’s Idea LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32307(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 18, 2016], has been taught before, starting most prominently with the First Department’s 2013 decision in Doyle v Icon, LLC and reinforced by that court two years later in Barone v Sowers, holding that minority member claims of oppressive majority conduct including systematic exclusion from the LLC’s… [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am
New York continues to buck the nationwide trend toward harmonization of close corporation and LLC law governing judicial dissolution, as made clear in cases such as Doyle v Icon and Barone v Sowers explicitly holding that New York’s LLC Law § 702 neither mentions nor otherwise accommodates oppression as a basis for seeking judicial dissolution. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:27 am
Under LLC Law § 702’s standard for dissolution as pronounced by the Second Department in the 1545 Ocean Avenue case, and under First Department case law (Doyle v Icon and more recently, Barone v Sowers) holding that a non-controlling member’s exclusion from management by itself does not constitute a valid claim for LLC dissolution, it’s difficult to see how the sparse allegations in the Koch petition could survive a motion to dismiss. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 8:47 am
Sowers, J. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
Council 15 Local 159 v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]