Search for: "Spath v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
When last we left Lawfare readers, the prosecution in the United States v. al-Nashiri military commission had begun “preadmission” of evidence despite the ongoing refusal of defense counsel to participate. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am
Following the events of Nov. 13 summarized in the last post in this series, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened on Tuesday, Nov. 14 to continue testimony and the “preadmission” of evidence relating to physical evidence from the site of the attack on the USS Cole, identified as Appellate Exhibit 207. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
In response to security concerns expressed by defense counsel in the underlying case, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:48 am
Vance Spath, to knock them out last month. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:46 am
. *** Pretrial hearings continue in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:37 pm
Tune in to explore: A host of Supreme Court developments, including action relating to DACA, immigration detention and the due process clause, Patchak and the question whether Congress can direct courts to dismiss a class of cases, and especially the United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court’s 1857 Dynes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
On Wednesday, Judge Spath held Gen. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:02 pm
Detainee Stuff: We’ve got an all-too-predictable Doe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
And on the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck discussed the retirement of military commissions Judge Vance Spath, arguments in Doe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
Daniel Byman analyzed the significance of the Trump administration’s decision on Tuesday to put North Korea back on the list of state sponsors of terrorism. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
Cue the United States’ motion to reconsider in five, four, three . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
