Search for: "Spears v. Howes" Results 21 - 40 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2012, 7:53 am by Paul Jacobson
That is why we have instructed our lawyers to approach the courts in-view of these violations and the defaming nature of the so-called President Zuma portrait titled ”The Spear”. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Android app pirates face charges in US http://t.co/HyEbKSe2R9 -> Why I gave the National Association of Broadcasters, DiMA and CCIA the Shirt off my Back during Congressional Panel http://t.co/TWhr6t7nOA -> Here's How Piracy Hurts Indie Filmmakers http://t.co/gIFaeGWFq5 -> Personal jurisdiction for copyright infringement by linking and streaming music UNIDISC v ANTIBEMUSIC MD Tenn. 2014http://t.co/jE20NJJz2p -> Non- exclusive copyright license confers no standing… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm by Susan Brenner
This is how I explain the plain view doctrine to my students: Assume police have a warrant to go to John Doe’s home and search for a stolen safe (a small one). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:23 am by Jon Sands
The district court, relying on Spears v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Eric Goldman recently singled out this passage in the UMG v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 10:47 am by Eric Goldman
Veoh how UMG claimed that every song from artists like Britney Spears was presumptively infringing, when in fact UMG only controlled part of the artists’ catalogs and thus had no right to speak about how the other catalog owners choose to manage their rights. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] How do you guard against a socially engineered spear phishing attack? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:31 am by Michael Risch
So, this study's assumption is that the filings of these words as trademarks are the tip of the spear. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]