Search for: "Stallings v. Chance" Results 21 - 40 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm by Florian Mueller
That one is at a different procedural stage, so HTC may have chosen a different course of action in that one.Yesterday I attended a German Nokia v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am by Robert Kreisman
Supreme Court may be stalled because of the current makeup of the court. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
Burwell, arguing that “by punting, stalling for time, taking a breather — whatever the justices thought they were doing back in May — the court gave the administration a chance to hit reset, a chance it was smart enough to take by asking its opponents finally to put their cards on the table and by inviting ordinary people to tell the world why the case matters. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Frank Pasquale
Of course, any implementation of MMT-driven campaign finance reform will need to sidestep SCOTUS's AZ FECFCPAC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 10:17 pm
No mention of substantive rulemaking authority; without this, some variant of Tafas v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:25 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s recall notice states that there is a chance that the fuel pump within the fuel tank would malfunction, increasing the possibility of the engine stalling while driving, increasing the odds of an accident. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
Because the State believed that proceeding simultaneously with both alleged victims would increase its chances for success at trial, the matter stalled for a period of time. * * * Affirmed.In Christopher Tubbs v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:00 pm
  The ADF brief also effectively quotes from the Supreme Court's 2004 Lockyer v. [read post]