Search for: "Stamps v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 8:27 am by Brendon Tavelli
On appeal, despite acknowledging that the trial court must be given “wide discretion” to consider the most appropriate procedure in each case, including Rule 23(b)(3)’s superiority requirement, the Ninth Circuit held that the lower court abused this discretion by denying class certification to Bateman. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Superior Court (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 612, 614.) [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:36 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania:  Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[A jurisprudential feast, compassionate releases, and superior addresses.] [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court, 135 Cal.App.4th 944 (2006) (rev. granted, April 26, 2006). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
Credit: Federal Circuit (what it looks like to argue there) One week ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
See also Ross Todd, Attorneys Accused of Filing Bogus Suits in Alleged Scheme to Stamp Out Negative Web Reviews * Consumer Opinion LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am by Jennifer Lynch
Notably, the court looked back to the Supreme Court’s decision in Ybarra v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:02 am by Don Cruse
The Court rejected the technical objections to its validity (among others: a photocopy had been filed rather than the original and the stamp was from a notary rather than the tax official). [read post]