Search for: "Standard v. U. S" Results 21 - 40 of 3,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Section 2 requires legally eligible depository institutions to meet certain additional safety and soundness standards and created three tiers of scrutiny. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Apr. 17, 2018) (granting motion to dismiss and noting that “[u]nder Illinois law, covenants not to compete are disfavored and held to a high standard”); Grand Vehicle Works Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
The Court’s reasoning drew upon well-established precedent regarding the standard for patentability. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The BBC, Sky News, The Irish News, Evening Standard, The Independent, and The Law Society Gazette covered the decision. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[9] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[10]This materiality standard is reflected when materiality appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company periodic and current reports.[11] In the 90 years since Roosevelt described the intent of the federal securities laws and the 40 years since Jack’s paper,… [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Obligaciones del Estado para el respeto y garantía de los derechos humanosfrente a acciones u omisiones de empresas públicas y privadas ......................... 42B.2. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Minn 2023), available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-agri-stats-inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Bob Ambrogi
The goal was to make all published U.S. court decisions freely available to the public in a standardized digital format. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
Whether the standard is willful blindness or constructive knowledge, the plaintiff’s allegations are sufficient: It is alleged that Pixels knew that products which infringed Canvasfish’s trademarks were being offered for sale by users of its website as early as September 2022. [read post]