Search for: "Stanford v. Paris"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2015, 5:03 pm
Supreme Court explained in 1931 in Near v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
March 7, 2024. 6-7:00 am ET (New York) / 11-12:00 pm GMT (Dakar) / 12-1:00 pm CET (Paris). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
As I argue in a forthcoming article in the Stanford Journal of International Law, the loss of habitable territory will have drastic implications for the populations at risk of displacement as well as the traditional conception of statehood under international law, which is commonly understood to possess a territory, permanent population, and a government with “a sufficient degree of independence in international relations. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
48 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 41 from 2011: HD 58.6 N4334 1999 Negotiating on behalf of others : advice to lawyers, business executives, sports agents, diplomats, politicians, and everybody else edited by Robert H. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am
But I would have also thought the same of criminalizing the teaching of law as “material support,” but the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
You can spend $130 million a year advertising (Advantage Rent-a-Car v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Electoral Commission.
Essay on the Principles of Circumstantial Evidence Illustrated by Numerous Cases
5th English ed. 1 v. (1905)
Wills, William; Wills, Alfred (Editor); Beers, George Emerson (Editor); Corbin, Arthur Linton (Editor)
French Law and Practice of Patents for Inventions, Improvements, and Importations
From the Paris ed. 1 v. (1834) Perpigna, Antoine
Index and Legislative History Uniform Code… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Tool Works Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
In the 19th volume, Jack Rakove, a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian at Stanford, has written “Beyond Belief, Beyond Conscience,” which explores the evolution of religious freedom from the 16th century to the modern era, focusing especially on history, philosophy and political theory. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
Not new: goes back to 1883 Paris Convention. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
--> (Ancient Automobile Trinidad, Cuba 2015 Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)I am pleased to let those interested know that I have posted a draft of my essay, "The Human Rights Obligations of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2020 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
Michael Klausner and Jason Hegland of Stanford Law School detailed in a guest post on this blog (here), since 2009, a significantly larger number of securities class action lawsuits (both in terms of absolute numbers of lawsuit filings and in terms of percentage of all lawsuits filed) are now being filed by a group of small plaintiffs’ firms that were not previously active in filing securities lawsuits. [read post]
