Search for: "Stanley v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 11:00 am by Cara Horowitz
On Friday afternoon, Judge Goldsmith of the California Superior Court issued his final order in the case pitting environmental justice advocates against the State’s Air Resources Board on the issue of cap and trade (order available here). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:37 am
Los Angeles County Court Locations LOCATIONS BY NAME Airport Courthouse 11701 S. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
United States (1878) to Employment Division v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
  He relied on the Supreme Court’s holding in Stanley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/281922.dis.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Stanley v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
On May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
As has been the trend, a court has held that despite what may be the superior parenting skills of one parent, that parent may be denied custody if that parent does not promote the relationship of the children with the other parent. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
  There have been a number of County Court judgments on this issue which have not necessarily been ad idem (see eg our post on Augustin v Barnet). [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:13 pm by Steven M. Sweat
City of Long Beach, BC 559317, that was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court demonstrates the principle of vicarious liability for public employees. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:09 am by David Markus
Attorneys Award for “Superior Litigation Team” in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
Superior Court:  Does a court commissioner, acting without the consent of the parties, have authority to summarily deny a petition for writ of habeas corpus or a petition for writ of mandate? [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 4:20 am
So did the plaintiffs choose a California state court because of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in the Luther v. [read post]