Search for: "Stanley v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
In Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
Moreno, 63 M.J. 129 (C.A.A.F. 2006), or United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
United States, No. 11-1395, which is pending a response from the Solicitor General (time to file extended to August 13), and Stanley v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
United States, No. 11-1395, which is pending a response from the Solicitor General (time to file extended to August 13), and Stanley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
Not only does the Solicitor General represent the interests of the United States government before the Court, but the office is also charged with assisting the Supreme Court in the exercise of its judicial function. . . . [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:56 am
Stanley's residence is one unit in an apartment complex comprised of six units. . . . [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm
United States, is still good law. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 10:01 pm
He ran for the United States House of Representatives in 1876, but was defeated. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:27 am
In Park v. [read post]
Court of Federal Claims Dismisses Bad Men Clause Suit over Sexual Abuse Perpetrated by Stanley Weber
10 Mar 2022, 8:29 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 7:03 am
United States, on the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions, and Stanley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
Finding first that Appellant introduced deadly force into the situation, thereby eliminating the ability of further escalation, citing United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:05 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently granted certiorari in Stanley v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:59 am
Citing State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:31 pm
The Minnesota case United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
