Search for: "Starr International Co. v. United States"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
United States A Haiti orphanage founder and a U.S. charity have been awarded more than $14 million combined in damages, after a Maine activist who publicised sexual abuse allegations against them was found guilty of defamation. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
(Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
Starr, Sanfor (Sandy) Svetcov, Hon. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Miller, editor ; with Louis Aucoin.Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010.Constitutional LawKF4930 .O75 2010The origins of the necessary and proper clause / Gary Lawson ... [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
