Search for: "Stat Medical Devices, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004) (dictum also extends rule to medical devices). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  Before the article could conduct any sort of statistical analysis, the author had to find a universe of post-Riegel medical device preemption cases. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm by Law Lady
No. 111-148, 1556(b), 124 Stat. 119, 260, eliminated the need for survivors who could meet its requirements to prove that their associated miners died due to black lung disease; it applied retroactively to survivors' claims filed in the specified period; and this retroactive application did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
Now, the preemption issues in Kent are a little (OK, a lot) different than in Riegel - implied versus express; drug versus medical device - but we found a surprising amount of overlap as well.Starting, as is proper with defendant/petitioner Warner Lambert's brief, it's probably appropriate to remind readers what the precise question is that the Supreme Court has agreed to decide:Whether, under the implied preemption principles of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:52 am
For devices, the reporting standard is any injury that "may have been attributed to a medical device. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm by Law Lady
Medtronic, 19 No. 8 Westlaw Journal Medical Devices 7, Westlaw Journal Medical Devices June 4, 2012 Medtronic Inc. is being sued by a Florida man who says his Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead cracked, exposing him to repeated, unnecessary shocks from his implanted cardiac rhythm management system. [read post]